The big tobacco companies concerned about the new electronic cigarette profits

Tobacco, according to the Consumer Affairs reports compiled each year have quit smoking. This month, tens of millions of consumers will be determined to kick the habit, many people will be successful. This is bad news for the tobacco companies, right? Not necessarily. The big tobacco companies health electronic cigarette can see the wind, but also to find a way to grab cash from the anti-tobacco movement.

 More and more tobacco companies are interested in the phenomenon of electronic cigarette. The electronic cigarette looks like tobacco cigarettes electronic equipment. However, instead of burning tobacco, nicotine-containing substance by evaporation. Smokers breathe in steam as he smoking. According to reports, it provides the same satisfaction of smoking, so smokers can quit smoking. Tobacco companies electronic cigarette In 2012, Lorillard Tobacco acquisition of Brooklyn (Blu) brand of electronic cigarette, and allegedly Renault will produce its own brand of electronic cigarette.

The strategy is simple: the tobacco companies lose smokers, they get a new electronic cigarette customers. In an interview with the U.S. NBC, said Wells Fargo analyst Bonnie Herzog (Bonnie Herzog), the income of electronic cigarettes produce up to 500 million U.S. dollars last year, and this year to double. Ironically, the government may ultimately be the big losers, transferred to the electronic cigarette smokers to give up cigarettes.

Heavy cigarette tax to stop people from smoking. Most of the cost of a pack of cigarettes into the purse of the state and federal government. Duty-free and unregulated The electronic cigarette is tax free and unregulated. As more and more consumers stop buying cigarettes and start smoking electronic cigarettes, tax revenue will decline. Minnesota is currently the only electronic cigarette taxing state, but other states are likely to take Elips e cig similar initiatives.

At the same time, the anti-smoking groups and health advocates have turned their attention to the electronic cigarette, warning that they are not without hazards. Researchers at the University of California, Riverside in 2010 evaluated five e-cigarette brands and found design flaws, lack of proper labels there are several quality control and health issues. They concluded that electronic cigarettes are potentially harmful, and urges regulators to consider the withdrawal from the market, the electronic cigarette to be fully assessed until their security.

 Last year, researchers at the University of Athens, Greece consumers to switch to the electronic cigarette may still hurt their lungs. Marketing Statement At the same time, the marketers of the electronic cigarette also attracted official attention in California and Oregon. In 2010, California sued the electronic cigarette retailer company in Florida "smoking everywhere" because their executives make electronic cigarette smoking is a safe choice "misleading and is not responsible for the statement.
 The state also said that the company for marketing to minors. A year ago, Oregon reached two settlement agreement, to prevent two national travel chain stores in Oregon sell electronic cigarette. But now, the electronic cigarette is still unregulated, a federal appeals court ruled that the U.S. government can not stop the sale or import of electronic cigarettes, e cigarette liquidthe U.S. Food and Drug Administration claims that it is dangerous, unregulated products. The District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled that the electronic cigarette is not sold as therapeutic purposes, FDA does not have the power to prohibit such products.